SecureMyOrg logo
Talk to Us

The ‘Pwn Request’ Vulnerability in Stripe’s Repo: Insights into the Security Flaw Exposed

pwn request

Due to a misconfiguration in Github action workflows, a security researcher was able to discover and exploit a ‘pwn request’ vulnerability in a public Stripe repository. This allowed the researcher to merge unauthorized commits into the main branch and exfiltrate the GitHub token used in the workflow to an endpoint they controlled.

Table of Contents

  1. Core Insights:
  2. Classic Pwn Request Vulnerability in the Workflow
  3. Structured Breakdown of The Attack
  4. Key Attack Mechanisms:
  5. Lessons Learned:
  6. References
  7. Why Businesses Trust SecureMyOrg for Comprehensive Network Security
  8. Relevant Posts

Core Insights:

  1. GitHub Actions Workflow Vulnerability:

    • GitHub Actions workflows are automated scripts that run various tasks in a development pipeline.
    • A misconfigured workflow likely allowed unauthorized actions, potentially leading to the exploitation of the “pwn request” vulnerability.

  2. “Pwn Request” Vulnerability:

    • This vulnerability may relate to manipulating or injecting malicious requests into the pipeline, exploiting the workflows to gain unauthorized access or execute malicious code.

  3. CI/CD Pipeline Security:

    • The incident highlights the importance of securing CI/CD pipelines. Such pipelines are a target for attackers due to their critical role in building, testing, and deploying code.

  4. Best Practices for Security:

    • Strict Workflow Configurations: Ensuring only authorized entities can trigger workflows.
    • Token Security: Limiting the scope and lifespan of tokens used in workflows to reduce exposure.
    • Branch Protection Policies: Enforcing policies to prevent unauthorized changes to critical branches.

Classic Pwn Request Vulnerability in the Workflow

risky workflow trigger
Risky Trigger -pull_request_target

Multiple workflows in the repository were vulnerable to a Pwn Request attack. Below is the breakdown of one such workflow’s misconfiguration:

  1. Risky Trigger – pull_request_target:

    • The workflow was configured to run on the pull_request_target event.
    • This trigger executes workflows in the context of the base repository, rather than the fork, and grants elevated privileges, including access to sensitive secrets such as the GitHub token.
    • While useful for certain use cases, it introduces significant risks when used improperly.

  2. Explicit Ref Checkout:

    • The vulnerable workflow included a job that checked out the code using an explicit ref of the pull request.
    • If the pull request originates from an untrusted fork, malicious actors can craft a pull request containing malicious code. This code gets executed with the elevated privileges provided by the pull_request_target trigger.
explicit-ref-checkout
-explicit ref checkout

Structured Breakdown of The Attack

1. Initial Pull Request and Exploit Execution

  • The security researcher submitted a pull request to the repository:
    PR #2719.
  • The pull request exploited the vulnerable pull_request_target trigger in the GitHub Actions workflow.
  • Exploit Code:
    • The exploit retrieved the GITHUB_TOKEN from the Git configuration.
    • Using the token, the attacker was able to merge the pull request into the main branch, bypassing authorization checks.
exploit code exporting github token
-exploit code retreiving the github token
merging pull request into the main branch
-merging pull request into the main branch

2. Exfiltration of GitHub Token

  • After the initial exploit, the researcher created another pull request to exfiltrate the GitHub token:
    PR #2723.
  • How the Exfiltration Worked:
    • The malicious code used wget to send the GITHUB_TOKEN to a researcher-controlled endpoint.
    • This exfiltration demonstrated the potential misuse of sensitive secrets exposed by the vulnerable workflow.
exfiltration of the token using wget
exfiltration of the token using wget

Key Attack Mechanisms:

  • Privilege Escalation:
    • By exploiting the pull_request_target trigger, the attacker gained elevated privileges within the workflow environment.
  • Token Abuse:
    • The GitHub token was used for unauthorized actions, including merging a pull request and leaking sensitive credentials.
  • Untrusted Code Execution:
    • The workflow executed untrusted pull request code, enabling the attacker to manipulate the repository.

Lessons Learned:

This attack underscores the critical need for:

  • Restricting GitHub Token Permissions: Tokens should have the least privileges required for workflows.
  • Careful Use of pull_request_target: This trigger should be used sparingly, with strict security controls.
  • Branch Protection Policies: Enforcing these policies can prevent unauthorized merges into protected branches.
  • Audit and Review Workflows: Regularly review and secure workflows to eliminate exploitable configurations.

This is a clear example of how misconfigured CI/CD workflows can lead to severe repository security breaches.

You might also like to read on the Command injection vulnerability in D-Link NAS devices

References

Why Businesses Trust SecureMyOrg for Comprehensive Network Security

At SecureMyOrg, we uncover and fix all possible security vulnerabilities of mobile and web, while providing solutions to mitigate risks. We are trusted by renowned companies like Yahoo, Gojek and Rippling, and with 100% client satisfaction, you’re in safe hands!

Some of the things people reach out to us for –

  1. Building their cybersecurity program from scratch – setting up cloud security using cost-effective tools, SIEM for alert monitoring, building policies for the company
  2. Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing ( VAPT ) – We have certified professionals, with certifications like OSCP, CREST – CPSA & CRT, CKA and CKS
  3. DevSecOps consulting
  4. Red Teaming activity
  5. Regular security audits, before product release
  6. Full time security engineers.
Book Your Free Security Consultation Today

Relevant Posts

RATs Advanced Persistent Remote Access Trojans

Top 5 Advanced Persistent Remote Access Trojans (RATs) in 2025

April 24, 2025 No Comments

This blog explores five of the most sophisticated Advanced Persistent Remote Access Trojans (AP-RATs) currently active in the cyber threat landscape. We analyze their infection vectors, stealth mechanisms, command-and-control infrastructure, and persistence techniques to help security professionals understand and defend against these high-risk threats.

Read More »

Subscribe to our newsletter !