BOLA vs. Other API Vulnerabilities: Why Object-Level Authorization Matters Most

Broken Object level Authorization vs Other Vulnerabilities

APIs are at the core of modern applications, enabling seamless communication between systems, devices, and services. However, as their usage increases, so does the potential for exploitation. The OWASP API Security Top 10 highlights the most pressing threats to API ecosystems. Among these, Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) stands out as the most critical and frequently exploited vulnerability. But what sets BOLA apart from the rest, and why should developers and security teams prioritize its mitigation above all?

In this blog, we’ll explore the significance of BOLA, compare it to other top API vulnerabilities, and discuss why it deserves a front-row seat in your API security strategy.

-Book Your FREE Security Consultation Today!

What is BOLA?

Broken Object Level Authorization occurs when an API fails to properly enforce access controls at the object level. This means a user can access data or resources they shouldn’t simply by manipulating object identifiers (e.g., changing a user ID or document ID in a request URL).

Example:

				
					GET /api/users/1234
				
			

If a user changes the ID to 1235 and receives another user’s data without authorization checks, the API is vulnerable to BOLA.

Why is BOLA So Dangerous?

  • Data Leakage: Attackers can gain access to sensitive personal or business data.

  • Simple to Exploit: Often requires no special tools, just a browser or script.

  • Widespread: Common in both REST and GraphQL APIs.

  • Hard to Detect: Traditional vulnerability scanners may miss object-level issues.

OWASP API Security Top 10: A Quick Overview

Here are the 2025 OWASP API Security Top 10 threats:

  1. Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA)

  2. Broken Authentication

  3. Broken Object Property Level Authorization (BOPLA)

  4. Unrestricted Resource Consumption

  5. Broken Function Level Authorization

  6. Unrestricted Access to Sensitive Business Flows

  7. Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF)

  8. Security Misconfiguration

  9. Improper Inventory Management

  10. Unsafe Consumption of APIs

Now, based on this information, let’s compare BOLA to 5 top listed threats.

VulnerabilityDescriptionAttack SurfaceDetection ComplexityExploit Impact
BOLAUnauthorized access to objects via ID manipulationREST/GraphQL APIsHighHigh
Broken AuthenticationFlawed login/session mechanismsLogin endpointsMediumHigh
BOPLAUnauthorized access to specific fields in an objectAPI payloadsHighMedium
Unrestricted Resource ConsumptionDoS via excessive API requests or payloadsRate limits and resourcesLowMedium
Broken Function Level AuthorizationUnauthorized access to restricted API functionsAdmin/privileged endpointsMediumHigh
Security MisconfigurationInsecure settings or missing controlsHeaders, permissions, configsMediumMedium

BOLA vs. Broken Authentication

Broken Authentication involves vulnerabilities in the authentication process, allowing attackers to impersonate users. While dangerous, it typically requires bypassing login mechanisms.

Key Differences:

  • Exploitation: BOLA can be exploited after authentication, while Broken Authentication targets the login process.

  • Impact: BOLA leads directly to unauthorized data access, often affecting many users.

Why BOLA Matters More: Even with secure authentication, a BOLA vulnerability can lead to massive data exposure.

BOLA vs. BOPLA (Broken Object Property Level Authorization)

BOPLA involves insufficient access controls on individual properties within an object, allowing manipulation of fields like user roles or permissions.

Key Differences:

  • Granularity: BOLA targets whole objects; BOPLA targets specific object fields.

  • Exploitability: BOLA is easier to discover and exploit.

Why BOLA Matters More: BOLA is more commonly exploited due to its simplicity and broader impact.

BOLA vs. Broken Function Level Authorization

This threat refers to improper access controls on API functions like administrative actions.

Key Differences:

  • Scope: Function-level vulnerabilities involve entire operations; BOLA affects data access.

  • Detection: Function-level issues may be easier to catch during testing.

Why BOLA Matters More: Most applications expose object data, and without proper checks, it’s an open invitation for attackers.

BOLA vs. Security Misconfiguration

Security misconfiguration involves improperly set security headers, permissions, or error messages.

Key Differences:

  • Nature: Misconfiguration is a setup issue; BOLA is a logical flaw in authorization.

  • Impact: Misconfigurations might expose systems; BOLA exposes data directly.

Why BOLA Matters More: BOLA directly impacts users’ privacy and business data.

Why BOLA is the Most Critical

1. It’s the Gateway to Data Breaches

Exploiting BOLA provides attackers direct access to unauthorized data. This leads to regulatory violations (e.g., GDPR, HIPAA) and loss of user trust.

2. It’s Simple Yet Powerful

Unlike complex injections or authentication bypasses, BOLA requires little more than changing an object ID. Yet, the impact is substantial.

3. Traditional Scanners Miss It

BOLA often requires context-specific logic to detect, which automated scanners may not handle well. Manual testing or context-aware automation is necessary.

4. It’s Common Across All API Types

RESTful, GraphQL, gRPC—BOLA doesn’t discriminate. It’s found wherever object references are exposed.

How to Prioritize BOLA Mitigation

Enforce Object-Level Access Controls

Every API request should validate whether the requester has permission to access the requested object.

Use Indirect References

Avoid exposing sequential IDs. Instead, use UUIDs or hashed values.

Implement RBAC/ABAC Systems

Restrict access based on user roles or contextual attributes.

Include BOLA Tests in CI/CD Pipelines

Automate authorization testing to catch BOLA before code reaches production.

Monitor and Log Access Attempts

Track object access patterns. Sudden changes or enumeration attempts can indicate BOLA exploitation.

Conclusion

BOLA represents the perfect storm of simplicity and severity. Among OWASP’s API threats, it remains the most common and impactful due to its direct path to sensitive data. While other vulnerabilities are dangerous, none offer the same low-effort, high-reward attack vector.

By understanding what makes BOLA so dangerous and taking active steps to mitigate it, organizations can significantly bolster their API security. Remember: authentication is just the beginning—authorization at the object level is where real security lies.


Why Businesses Trust SecureMyOrg for Comprehensive Network Security​

At SecureMyOrg, we uncover and fix all possible security vulnerabilities of mobile and web, while providing solutions to mitigate risks. We are trusted by renowned companies like Yahoo, Gojek and Rippling, and with 100% client satisfaction, you’re in safe hands!

Some of the things people reach out to us for –

  1. Building their cybersecurity program from scratch – setting up cloud security using cost-effective tools, SIEM for alert monitoring, building policies for the company
  2. Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing ( VAPT ) – We have certified professionals, with certifications like OSCP, CREST – CPSA & CRT, CKA and CKS
  3. DevSecOps consulting
  4. Red Teaming activity
  5. Regular security audits, before product release
  6. Full time security engineers.

Relevant Posts

Subscribe to our newsletter !

Please fill the form for a prompt response!