In API Security, two critical vulnerabilities often confuse developers and security professionals alike: Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) and Broken Object Property Level Authorization (BOPLA). While both relate to authorization issues in APIs, they affect applications in distinct ways. Understanding the nuances between these vulnerabilities is crucial for securing APIs, especially in complex environments like microservices, GraphQL, and mobile applications.
In this blog, we will break down what BOLA and BOPLA mean, how they differ, and why addressing both is essential for robust API security.
-Book Your FREE Security Consultation Today!
Table of Contents
What is BOLA?
Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA), also known as Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR), occurs when an API does not properly enforce authorization checks before allowing access to an object based on user-supplied input, such as an ID.
Example Scenario:
A user sends a GET request:
GET /api/users/12345
If the application does not verify whether the requesting user is authorized to access user ID 12345, any authenticated user might be able to view or modify someone else’s data simply by changing the ID.
Real-World Impact:
Unauthorized data access
Data tampering or deletion
Privilege escalation
What is BOPLA?
Broken Object Property Level Authorization (BOPLA) is a more granular vulnerability where the application fails to enforce authorization rules for specific properties or fields of an object. Even if the object-level access is correctly implemented, unauthorized users might still manipulate or access individual attributes within that object.
Example Scenario:
A user sends a PUT request:
PUT /api/users/12345
{
"role": "admin",
"email": "user@example.com"
}
Even if the user is allowed to update their own profile (user ID 12345), they should not be able to change sensitive properties like role. If the API does not enforce field-level authorization, the user can exploit this to elevate their privileges.
Real-World Impact:
Unauthorized access to sensitive fields
Role escalation
Data integrity issues
Key Differences Between BOLA and BOPLA
-Click to find out how to identify and fix BOLA vulnerabilities in your APIs
| Feature | BOLA | BOPLA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope of Authorization | Object-level | Property/Field-level |
| Common Attack Vector | ID manipulation in URL | JSON body manipulation |
| Example Exploit | Accessing another user’s record | Changing one’s role to admin |
| Risk Category | Horizontal and Vertical privilege escalation | Fine-grained access control violations |
| Mitigation | Enforce object-level permissions | Apply field-level access control |
Why BOPLA Is Gaining Attention
With the increasing adoption of GraphQL, mobile APIs, and rich client-side apps, developers expose more detailed data schemas through APIs. GraphQL, in particular, allows clients to request specific fields of objects, making field-level authorization critical. BOPLA vulnerabilities become more common in such setups, where even authorized users can misuse exposed fields.
Additionally, modern API security testing tools are starting to incorporate automated checks for BOPLA, recognizing its growing relevance.
How to Identify BOLA and BOPLA Vulnerabilities
Identifying BOLA:
Analyze API endpoints with object identifiers (e.g.,
/users/{id}).Check if users can access others’ objects by manipulating IDs.
Test for both read and write operations.
Identifying BOPLA:
Look for APIs that allow updates via JSON payloads.
Modify individual fields like
isAdmin,balance, orpermissions.Check whether the server accepts unauthorized changes.
Tools to Help:
OWASP ZAP
Burp Suite with BOLA/BOPLA plugins
Postman for manual field manipulation
Custom scripts and fuzzers
Best Practices to Prevent BOLA and BOPLA
For BOLA:
Use centralized access control logic.
Verify ownership or access rights for every object.
Avoid trusting user-supplied IDs.
For BOPLA:
Implement attribute-based access control (ABAC).
Create access rules for sensitive fields.
Sanitize and validate all incoming request payloads.
General Recommendations:
Perform regular security testing.
Educate developers on both object- and property-level access controls.
Integrate API security checks into CI/CD pipelines.
Conclusion
Both BOLA and BOPLA are serious vulnerabilities that stem from insufficient access control mechanisms in APIs. While BOLA targets entire objects and is often easier to detect, BOPLA goes deeper, targeting individual fields within those objects. As APIs continue to evolve and become more flexible, attackers are exploiting these subtle gaps more frequently.
Understanding the difference between these two vulnerabilities—and applying the right mitigation strategies—is essential for developers and security teams aiming to build secure, scalable APIs. The key is not just controlling who can access an API, but also what and how much they can see or change.
In the era of microservices and Zero Trust, the granularity of access control could mean the difference between a minor bug and a catastrophic data breach.
You might like:
Why Businesses Trust SecureMyOrg for Comprehensive Network Security
At SecureMyOrg, we uncover and fix all possible security vulnerabilities of mobile and web, while providing solutions to mitigate risks. We are trusted by renowned companies like Yahoo, Gojek and Rippling, and with 100% client satisfaction, you’re in safe hands!
Some of the things people reach out to us for –
- Building their cybersecurity program from scratch – setting up cloud security using cost-effective tools, SIEM for alert monitoring, building policies for the company
- Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing ( VAPT ) – We have certified professionals, with certifications like OSCP, CREST – CPSA & CRT, CKA and CKS
- DevSecOps consulting
- Red Teaming activity
- Regular security audits, before product release
- Full time security engineers.
Relevant Posts
Top 5 IoT Remote Access Trojans Crippling Devices in 2025
IoT devices are under siege in 2025 as Remote Access Trojans exploit their vulnerabilities at scale. This blog breaks down the top 5 IoT RATs causing widespread disruption.
Top 5 Web-Based Remote Access Trojans That Are Dominating 2025
Web-based Remote Access Trojans are becoming the go-to tool for cybercriminals in 2025. This post highlights five of the most widespread and dangerous ones currently in use.
Unstoppable Malware: Top 5 Modular Remote Access Trojans Dominating 2025
Modular Remote Access Trojans are evolving fast in 2025, making them harder to detect and remove. This post explores five of the most dangerous RATs currently used in cyberattacks.
Top 5 Mobile Remote Access Trojans Wreaking Havoc in 2025
Uncover the top 5 mobile RATs of 2025, learn how they infect devices, execute attacks, and discover key strategies to detect and stop them effectively.
Top 5 Advanced Persistent Remote Access Trojans (RATs) in 2025
This blog explores five of the most sophisticated Advanced Persistent Remote Access Trojans (AP-RATs) currently active in the cyber threat landscape. We analyze their infection vectors, stealth mechanisms, command-and-control infrastructure, and persistence techniques to help security professionals understand and defend against these high-risk threats.
Top 5 Basic Remote Access Trojans (RATs) You Shouldn’t Ignore in 2025
Remote Access Trojans (RATs) remain a major cybersecurity threat in 2025. Learn about the top 5 basic yet dangerous RATs known for stealthy infiltration, keylogging, and full system control. Learn how they operate and how to defend against them.