BOLA vs. BOPLA: Understanding the Differences in API Security

BOLA vs BOPLA

In API Security, two critical vulnerabilities often confuse developers and security professionals alike: Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) and Broken Object Property Level Authorization (BOPLA). While both relate to authorization issues in APIs, they affect applications in distinct ways. Understanding the nuances between these vulnerabilities is crucial for securing APIs, especially in complex environments like microservices, GraphQL, and mobile applications.

In this blog, we will break down what BOLA and BOPLA mean, how they differ, and why addressing both is essential for robust API security.

-Book Your FREE Security Consultation Today!

Table of Contents

What is BOLA?

Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA), also known as Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR), occurs when an API does not properly enforce authorization checks before allowing access to an object based on user-supplied input, such as an ID.

Example Scenario:

A user sends a GET request:

				
					GET /api/users/12345
				
			

If the application does not verify whether the requesting user is authorized to access user ID 12345, any authenticated user might be able to view or modify someone else’s data simply by changing the ID.

Real-World Impact:

  • Unauthorized data access

  • Data tampering or deletion

  • Privilege escalation

What is BOPLA?

Broken Object Property Level Authorization (BOPLA) is a more granular vulnerability where the application fails to enforce authorization rules for specific properties or fields of an object. Even if the object-level access is correctly implemented, unauthorized users might still manipulate or access individual attributes within that object.

Example Scenario:

A user sends a PUT request:

				
					PUT /api/users/12345
{
  "role": "admin",
  "email": "user@example.com"
}
				
			

Even if the user is allowed to update their own profile (user ID 12345), they should not be able to change sensitive properties like role. If the API does not enforce field-level authorization, the user can exploit this to elevate their privileges.

Real-World Impact:

  • Unauthorized access to sensitive fields

  • Role escalation

  • Data integrity issues

Key Differences Between BOLA and BOPLA

-Click to find out how to identify and fix BOLA vulnerabilities in your APIs

FeatureBOLABOPLA
Scope of AuthorizationObject-levelProperty/Field-level
Common Attack VectorID manipulation in URLJSON body manipulation
Example ExploitAccessing another user’s recordChanging one’s role to admin
Risk CategoryHorizontal and Vertical privilege escalationFine-grained access control violations
MitigationEnforce object-level permissionsApply field-level access control

Why BOPLA Is Gaining Attention

With the increasing adoption of GraphQL, mobile APIs, and rich client-side apps, developers expose more detailed data schemas through APIs. GraphQL, in particular, allows clients to request specific fields of objects, making field-level authorization critical. BOPLA vulnerabilities become more common in such setups, where even authorized users can misuse exposed fields.

Additionally, modern API security testing tools are starting to incorporate automated checks for BOPLA, recognizing its growing relevance.

How to Identify BOLA and BOPLA Vulnerabilities

Identifying BOLA:

  1. Analyze API endpoints with object identifiers (e.g., /users/{id}).

  2. Check if users can access others’ objects by manipulating IDs.

  3. Test for both read and write operations.

Identifying BOPLA:

  1. Look for APIs that allow updates via JSON payloads.

  2. Modify individual fields like isAdmin, balance, or permissions.

  3. Check whether the server accepts unauthorized changes.

Tools to Help:

  • OWASP ZAP

  • Burp Suite with BOLA/BOPLA plugins

  • Postman for manual field manipulation

  • Custom scripts and fuzzers

Best Practices to Prevent BOLA and BOPLA

For BOLA:

  • Use centralized access control logic.

  • Verify ownership or access rights for every object.

  • Avoid trusting user-supplied IDs.

For BOPLA:

  • Implement attribute-based access control (ABAC).

  • Create access rules for sensitive fields.

  • Sanitize and validate all incoming request payloads.

General Recommendations:

  • Perform regular security testing.

  • Educate developers on both object- and property-level access controls.

  • Integrate API security checks into CI/CD pipelines.

Conclusion

Both BOLA and BOPLA are serious vulnerabilities that stem from insufficient access control mechanisms in APIs. While BOLA targets entire objects and is often easier to detect, BOPLA goes deeper, targeting individual fields within those objects. As APIs continue to evolve and become more flexible, attackers are exploiting these subtle gaps more frequently.

Understanding the difference between these two vulnerabilities—and applying the right mitigation strategies—is essential for developers and security teams aiming to build secure, scalable APIs. The key is not just controlling who can access an API, but also what and how much they can see or change.

In the era of microservices and Zero Trust, the granularity of access control could mean the difference between a minor bug and a catastrophic data breach.

You might like:


Why Businesses Trust SecureMyOrg for Comprehensive Network Security​

At SecureMyOrg, we uncover and fix all possible security vulnerabilities of mobile and web, while providing solutions to mitigate risks. We are trusted by renowned companies like Yahoo, Gojek and Rippling, and with 100% client satisfaction, you’re in safe hands!

Some of the things people reach out to us for –

  1. Building their cybersecurity program from scratch – setting up cloud security using cost-effective tools, SIEM for alert monitoring, building policies for the company
  2. Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing ( VAPT ) – We have certified professionals, with certifications like OSCP, CREST – CPSA & CRT, CKA and CKS
  3. DevSecOps consulting
  4. Red Teaming activity
  5. Regular security audits, before product release
  6. Full time security engineers.

Relevant Posts

Subscribe to our newsletter !

Please fill the form for a prompt response!